Clinical course of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in individuals present during the outbreak on the Diamond Princess cruise ship.

We investigated the clinical course of individuals with 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) who were transferred from the Diamond Princess cruise ship to 12 local hospitals. The conditions and clinical courses of patients with pneumonia were compared with those of patients without pneumonia. Among 70 patients (median age: 67 years) analyzed, the major symptoms were fever (64.3%), cough (54.3%), and general fatigue (24.3%). Forty-three patients (61.4%) had pneumonia. Higher body temperature, heart rate, and respiratory rate as well as higher of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and lower serum albumin level and lymphocyte count were associated with the presence of pneumonia. Ground-glass opacity was found in 97.7% of the patients with pneumonia. Patients were administered neuraminidase inhibitors (20%), lopinavir/ritonavir (32.9%), and ciclesonide inhalation (11.4%). Mechanical ventilation and veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was performed on 14 (20%) and 2 (2.9%) patients, respectively; two patients died. The median duration of intubation was 12 days. The patients with COVID-19 transferred to local hospitals during the outbreak had severe conditions and needed close monitoring. The severity of COVID-19 depends on the presence of pneumonia. High serum LDH, AST and CRP levels and low serum albumin level and lymphocyte count were found to be predictors of pneumonia. It was challenging for local hospitals to admit and treat these patients during the outbreak of COVID-19. Assessment of severity was crucial to manage a large number of patients.

Comparison of anti-inflammatory effects of rivaroxaban vs. dabigatran in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (RIVAL-AF study): multicenter randomized study.

Some experimental studies have shown that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have anti-inflammatory effects. However, the interval changes in inflammatory markers in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who receive DOACs remain unknown. Between July 2013 and April 2014, a total of 187 AF patients randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban (n = 91) or dabigatran (n = 96) were assessed for eligibility. The levels of the following inflammatory markers were serially evaluated: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, pentraxin-3, interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, IL-18, tumor necrosis factor-α, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, growth and differentiation factor-15, and soluble thrombomodulin (sTM). The aim in this study was to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effects of rivaroxaban and dabigatran in patients with AF, in addition to the impact of markers on bleeding events. Finally, 117 patients (rivaroxaban: n = 55, dabigatran: n = 62) were included in the analysis at 12 months. Although the interval changes in sTM levels tended to be greater in the dabigatran group [0.3 (0-0.7) vs. 0.5 (0-1.0) FU/ml, p = 0.061], there were no significant differences in the interval changes in any inflammatory marker between 2 groups. There were no significant differences in bleeding events between 2 groups. The interval changes in sTM levels were significantly greater in patients with bleeding compared with those without [0.8 (0.5-1.3) vs. 0.4 (- 0.1-0.8) FU/ml, p = 0.017]. There were no significant differences in the interval changes in any inflammatory marker between rivaroxaban and dabigatran treatments in patients with AF. The increased levels of sTM after DOACs treatment might be related to bleeding events.

Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Previous Myocardial Infarction and Mild Diabetes Mellitus Following Treatment With Pioglitazone: Reports of a Randomised Trial From The Japan Working Group for the Assessment Whether Pioglitazone Protects DM Patients Against Re-Infarction (PPAR Study).

BACKGROUND: Secondary prevention in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) is critically important to prevent ischaemic heart failure and reduce social burden. Pioglitazone improves vascular dysfunction and prevents coronary atherosclerosis, mainly via anti-inflammatory and antiatherogenic effects by enhancing adiponectin production in addition to antihyperglycemic effects, thus suggesting that pioglitazone attenuates cardiovascular events in patients with mild (HbA1c levels < 6·5%) diabetes mellitus (DM). Therefore, we evaluated the effects of pioglitazone on cardiovascular events in patients with both previous MI and mild DM. METHODS: In this multicentre, prospective, randomised, open, blinded-endpoint trial, we randomly assigned 630 patients with mild DM with a history of MI to undergo either DM therapy with (pioglitazone group) or without (control group) pioglitazone. DM was diagnosed using the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, and mild DM was defined if HbA1c level was < 6·5%. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalisation caused by acute MI, unstable angina, coronary revascularisation (including percutaneous coronary intervention and cardiac bypass surgery), and stroke. FINDINGS: HbA1C levels were 5·9 and 5·8% (p = 0·71) at baseline and 6·0 and 5·8% (p < 0·01) at 2 years for the control and pioglitazone groups, respectively.The primary endpoint was observed in 14·2% and 14·1% patients in the control and pioglitazone groups during two years (95% confidential interval (CI):0.662-1·526, p = 0·98), respectively; the incidence of MI and cerebral infarction was 0·3% and 2·2% (95%CI: 0·786-32·415, p = 0·09) and 1·0% and 0·3% (95%CI: 0·051-3·662, p = 0·44), respectively. Post-hoc analyses of the 7-year observation period showed that these trends were comparable (21·9% and 19·2% in the control and pioglitazone groups, 95%CI: 0.618-1·237, p = 0·45). INTERPRETATION: Pioglitazone could not reduce the occurrence of cardiovascular events in patients with mild DM and previous MI.

Does Treatment of Impaired Glucose Tolerance Improve Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Previous Myocardial Infarction?

PURPOSE: We evaluated the effects of an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, voglibose, on cardiovascular events in patients with a previous myocardial infarction (MI) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). METHODS: This prospective, randomized, open, blinded-endpoint study was conducted in 112 hospitals and clinics in Japan in 3000 subjects with both previous MI and IGT receiving voglibose (0.6 mg/day, n = 424) or no drugs (n = 435) for 2 years. The Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) recommended discontinuation of the study in June 2012 after an interim analysis when the outcomes of 859 subjects were obtained. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular events including cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal unstable angina, nonfatal stroke, and percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass graft. Secondary endpoints included individual components of the primary endpoint in addition to all-cause mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure. RESULTS: The age, ratio of males, and HbA1C were 65 vs. 65 years, 86 vs. 87%, and 5.6 vs. 5.5% in the groups with and without voglibose, respectively. Voglibose improved IGT; however, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant between-group difference with respect to cardiovascular events [12.5% with voglibose vs. 10.1% without voglibose for the primary endpoint (95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.86)]; there were no significant differences in secondary endpoints. CONCLUSION: Although voglibose effectively treated IGT, no additional benefits for cardiovascular events in patients with previous MI and IGT were observed. Voglibose may not be a contributing therapy to the secondary prevention in patients with MI and IGT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT00212017.

Long-term effects of ezetimibe-plus-statin therapy on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels as compared with double-dose statin therapy in patients with coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the mechanism of long-term LDL-C-lowering effect of ezetimibe-plus-statin. METHODS: Coronary artery disease patients whose LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL after treatment with atorvastatin 10 mg/day or rosuvastatin 2.5 mg/day were randomly assigned to receive ezetimibe 10 mg/day + statin (n = 78) or double-dose statin (n = 72) for 52 weeks. RESULTS: Greater LDL-C reduction was observed and maintained until 52 weeks in ezetimibe-plus-statin, while LDL-C levels re-increased after 12 weeks in double-dose statin. Although lathosterol/TC increased, campesterol/TC decreased more in ezetimibe-plus-statin. In contrast, lathosterol/TC unchanged and campesterol/TC increased, increasing campesterol/lathosterol ratio for 52 weeks in double-dose statin. Plasma PCSK9 levels were higher in double-dose statin than in ezetimibe-plus-statin at 12 weeks, but similar at 52 weeks. CONCLUSION: Although the difference in PCSK9 between 2 groups was transient, that in both campesterol and lathosterol persisted until 52 weeks. These results demonstrated simultaneous inhibition of cholesterol absorption and synthesis provides stable and greater decrease in LDL-C levels.

Clinical usefulness of additional treatment with ezetimibe in patients with coronary artery disease on statin therapy. - From the viewpoint of cholesterol metabolism.-.

BACKGROUND: Ezetimibe-plus-statin therapy has been reported to provide greater reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level than statin monotherapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between LDL-C lowering effect and baseline cholesterol absorption and synthesis markers in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 171 patients with CAD whose LDL-C level was ≥ 100 mg/dl after treatment with atorvastatin (10mg/day) or rosuvastatin (2.5 mg/day) for 4 weeks were assigned to additionally receive ezetimibe (10mg/day) plus a statin or a double dose of statin for 12 weeks. The decreases in LDL-C (-30.0 ± 15.6 mg/dl vs. -19.2 ± 14.2 mg/dl) and the ratio of campesterol, an absorption marker, to total cholesterol levels (-1.35 ± 0.90 µg/mg vs. 0.33 ± 0.74 µg/mg) were greater in the ezetimibe-plus-statin group (P<0.05, respectively). The decrease in LDL-C level in the ezetimibe-plus-statin group was greatest in patients with baseline levels of higher absorption and lower synthesis markers and smallest in patients with baseline levels of lower absorption and higher synthesis markers (-34.3 ± 15.6 mg/dl vs. -21.5 ± 16.7 mg/dl, P<0.05). The decrease in LDL-C did not differ, irrespective of baseline levels of cholesterol absorption and synthesis markers, in the double-dose statin group, and was similar to that in patients with lower absorption and higher synthesis markers in the ezetimibe-plus-statin group. CONCLUSIONS: Ezetimibe-plus-statin therapy may be useful for lowering LDL-C level, irrespective of baseline levels of cholesterol absorption and synthesis markers.